In the current issue of the Texas Law Review, Ethan Ranis (J.D. Candidate, University of Texas School of Law, 2015): Loose Constraints: The Bare Minimum for Solum’s Originalism (93 Texas L. Rev. 765). Here is the abstract:
What does or does not constitute originalism continues to be important when drawing lines in legal academic debate. In order to cast some light on this issue, Mr. Ranis examines Lawrence B. Solum’s theory of originalism and seeks to identify the ‘bare minimum’ theory that Solum would consider to be originalist. Mr. Ranis concludes that Solum’s current definition of originalism is too vague to truly capture the state of current constitutional debate.
Posted at 6:42 AM