At NRO, Ed Whelan responds to William Eskridge on the merits of the same-sex marriage argument: Originalism and Marriage. He begins: "I think that Eskridge’s claim is wildly implausible, indeed preposterous."
Posted at 6:26 AM
The Blog of the Center for the Study of Constitutional Originalism at the University of San Diego School of Law
At NRO, Ed Whelan responds to William Eskridge on the merits of the same-sex marriage argument: Originalism and Marriage. He begins: "I think that Eskridge’s claim is wildly implausible, indeed preposterous."
Posted at 6:26 AM