Mike Greve on the Taxing Power Argument
Mike Rappaport

At the Liberty Law Blog, my co-blogger, Mike Greve, defends Michael Paulsen against my criticism of Paulsen’s defense of Chief Justice Roberts’s tax argument in Sibelius.  While Paulsen describes himself as an originalist, and Greve is uncomfortable with orthodox originalism, it is important to recognize that Greve and Paulsen have something very much in common.  They are both strong Hamiltonians and […]

Mike Paulsen’s Defense of Chief Justice Roberts’ Health Care Opinion

Originalist law professor Mike Paulsen has written a short essay defending Chief Justice Roberts’s decision upholding the Health Care Law as a tax. It might seem like a serious matter that a right wing originalist endorses Roberts’s decision.  Perhaps critics of Roberts’s opinion need to rethink their criticisms.  But no such rethinking is necessary, because […]

Justice Ginsburg and the Abstract Meaning Fallacy
Mike Rappaport

As Mike Ramsey noted, the Wall Street Journal has reported on Justice Ginsburg's remarks on the Framers' plans for the Constitution:  “The founders of our country were great men with a vision,” Justice Ginsburg said. “They were held back from realizing their idea by the times in which they lived. But, she added, their notion […]

Should Ben Bernanke Be Impeached?
Mike Rappaport

Over at his Economics One Blog, economist John Taylor discusses a recent speech by the former Wells Fargo Chairman and CEO Dick Kovacevich, who explains how he was forced to take TARP funds by U.S. Treasury Secretary Hank Paulson and Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke: In his speech, Kovacevich first described how he and the […]

Precedent and the Health Care Decision
Mike Rappaport

At the New Republic, Adrian Vermeule has an excellent essay on precedent.   Vermeule makes the following points: 1.  “Precedent has limited constraining force, especially in hard cases at the Supreme Court.”  And “the Justices are not particularly faithful to their own precedents, let alone to those written by others.” 2.  “If the Justices rarely overrule […]

Eric Claeys on The Continuing Unconstitutionality of Obamacare
Mike Rappaport

Eric Claeys has a very interesting piece at NRO arguing that Obamacare is unconstitutional and that opponents of Obamacare should continue to make the argument that it is unconstitutional, despite the Supreme Court’s decision. Here is Eric on the unconstitutionality of Obamacare: To justify the mandate as a tax, Roberts made two major legal errors. […]