November 17, 2025

At the New Reform Club, Seth Barrett Tillman: Not Quite Schrödinger’s Cat—At least not yet. From the introduction:

My amicus briefs and publications (including co-authored publications) are on both sides of the parallel federal and state Trump election-law-related litigation in: People of the State of New York v. Donald J. Trump, No. 24-2299-cv (2d Cir. Nov. 6, 2025), Doc. No. 104.1, 2025 WL 3096170 (per curiam) (ordering remand); People of the State of New York v. Donald J. Trump, Indictment No. 71543-23, 86 Misc. 3d 810, 224 N.Y.S.3d 832 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. Dec. 16, 2024) (Merchan, J.), appeal filed, App. No. 2025-00648 (N.Y. App. Div. 1st Dept. notice of appeal filed: Jan. 31, 2025) (briefing ongoing).

How many law professors can say they have written on both sides of Trump-related issues? (Ed.: Ahem, um, I can.)  The chances are that Trump is not right all the time nor wrong all the time.  If your scholarship doesn’t reflect that, there may be something wrong with your scholarship.

RELATED:  Other recent posts from Professor Tillman:

Seth Barrett Tillman, Clearing Up Linguistic Confusion Involving Older Documents, New Reform Club (Nov. 6, 2025)
Seth Barrett Tillman, The Silence of the Criminal Defense Bar, New Reform Club (Nov. 5, 2025)

Posted at 1:01 AM